<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Procul Harum: paler shade of white afterall</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ipwars.com/2009/07/31/procul-harum-paler-shade-of-white-afterall/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ipwars.com/2009/07/31/procul-harum-paler-shade-of-white-afterall/</link>
	<description>Mainly intellectual property (IP) issues Down Under</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 03:14:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ipwars.com &#124; Injunctions or damages?</title>
		<link>http://ipwars.com/2009/07/31/procul-harum-paler-shade-of-white-afterall/comment-page-1/#comment-1755</link>
		<dc:creator>ipwars.com &#124; Injunctions or damages?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 09:27:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ipwars.com/?p=926#comment-1755</guid>
		<description>[...] with a question of trespass to land but, having regard to the House of Lords&#8217; remarks in Fisher v Brooker, may be worth bearing in mind in intellectual property cases as, generally, an IP owner seeks an [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] with a question of trespass to land but, having regard to the House of Lords&#8217; remarks in Fisher v Brooker, may be worth bearing in mind in intellectual property cases as, generally, an IP owner seeks an [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
