Comments on: Apotex v Sanofi http://ipwars.com/2012/07/19/apotex-v-sanofi/ Mainly intellectual property (IP) issues Down Under Thu, 28 Feb 2013 02:05:04 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 By: ipwars.com » Blog Archive » Apotex v Sanofi: the (un)implied licence http://ipwars.com/2012/07/19/apotex-v-sanofi/comment-page-1/#comment-3985 ipwars.com » Blog Archive » Apotex v Sanofi: the (un)implied licence Thu, 02 Aug 2012 21:57:29 +0000 http://ipwars.com/?p=1885#comment-3985 [...] v Sanofi: the (un)implied licence In addition to finding Sanofi’s patent infringed, the Full Court affirmed Jagot J’s conclusion that Apotex had no implied licence to reproduce the [...]

]]>