ipwars.com » Because I felt like it

Buy Ativan No Prescription

war — Tue, 17 Aug 2010 08:30:54 +0000

Buy Ativan No Prescription, Sorry, testing whether authentication completed correctly. Where can i buy cheapest Ativan online. Buy Ativan online no prescription. Ativan for sale. Buy generic Ativan. Purchase Ativan online. Order Ativan online c.o.d. Purchase Ativan online no prescription. Buy Ativan in canada. Order Ativan. Online buying Ativan. Rx free Ativan. Buy Ativan no prescription. Where can i order Ativan without prescription. Buy Ativan online cod. Buy cheap Ativan no rx. Buy cheapest Ativan. Order Ativan no prescription. Ativan price. Buy Ativan without a prescription. Ativan pharmacy. Online buy Ativan without a prescription. Buy no prescription Ativan online. Ativan samples. Where can i find Ativan online. Buy Ativan from mexico. Australia, uk, us, usa, canada, mexico, india, craiglist, ebay, paypal. Where can i buy Ativan online. Order Ativan from mexican pharmacy. Ativan over the counter. Ativan from canadian pharmacy.

Buy Flagyl No Prescription

war — Sat, 10 Apr 2010 00:30:03 +0000

See Buy Flagyl No Prescription, for yourself.

Of course, buy cheap Flagyl no rx, Buy Flagyl from mexico, in 1710, Great Britain still operated on the Julian Calendar (the Gregorian calendar not being adopted until September 1752) 10 April 1710 in the Julian calendar would have been 21 April 1710 in the Gregorian calendar (using this calculator, australia, uk, us, usa, canada, mexico, india, craiglist, ebay, paypal, Order Flagyl no prescription, or for those of you who remember fondly things like RPN, try here), order Flagyl online c.o.d. Order Flagyl from mexican pharmacy, So, it seems we still have time to plan the party, where can i buy Flagyl online. Flagyl over the counter, Maybe we could combine it with the plastic-y world IP day celebrations on 26 April.

Lid dip: Kay Lam-MacLeod, buy cheapest Flagyl. Flagyl from canadian pharmacy. Order Flagyl. Flagyl for sale. Buy generic Flagyl. Where can i buy cheapest Flagyl online. Rx free Flagyl. Online buying Flagyl. Buy Flagyl no prescription. Buy no prescription Flagyl online. Flagyl price. Purchase Flagyl online. Purchase Flagyl online no prescription. Buy Flagyl online cod. Buy Flagyl without a prescription. Buy Flagyl in canada. Flagyl samples. Where can i order Flagyl without prescription. Where can i find Flagyl online. Buy Flagyl online no prescription. Flagyl pharmacy. Online buy Flagyl without a prescription.

Buy Iressa No Prescription

war — Tue, 23 Mar 2010 09:34:18 +0000

Buy Iressa No Prescription, Last week, various news agencies carried reports about a showing of Australia's oldest, or oldest surviving, film - Patineur Grotesque.

The story, where can i order Iressa without prescription, Buy Iressa no prescription, with links to the video, at the ABC, buy Iressa from mexico, Order Iressa online c.o.d, the Age and the SMH. The curator's clip and notes at Australian Screen, Iressa pharmacy. Purchase Iressa online no prescription, It was made by Marius Sestier, on a mission from the Lumiere brothers, buy no prescription Iressa online, Order Iressa from mexican pharmacy, in 1896; but apparently not shown in Australia (for risk of defamation?).

Wikipedia lists it as one of 3 "first" Australian films, buy Iressa online cod. Iressa samples, However, if the Age is to be believed, online buy Iressa without a prescription, Rx free Iressa, M. Sestier arrived in Australia with the new fangled invention only to find the pesky Rickard had already introduced the movies, Iressa for sale. Buy cheap Iressa no rx. Iressa from canadian pharmacy. Where can i buy Iressa online. Where can i buy cheapest Iressa online. Australia, uk, us, usa, canada, mexico, india, craiglist, ebay, paypal. Buy Iressa without a prescription. Order Iressa. Where can i find Iressa online. Iressa over the counter. Buy cheapest Iressa. Buy Iressa online no prescription. Order Iressa no prescription. Iressa price. Online buying Iressa. Buy generic Iressa. Purchase Iressa online. Buy Iressa in canada.

New Chief Judge of the Federal Court

war — Wed, 10 Feb 2010 08:08:45 +0000

The Attorney-General has announced that Justice Pat Keane will become the new Chief Justice of the Federal Court on the statutory retirement on 21 March of Chief JusticeMichael Black.

Justice Keane is currently a Justice of Appeal in Queensland and will become the third Chief Justice.

Announcement here.

Lid dip: Peter Clarke

Holidays

war — Thu, 24 Dec 2009 12:09:39 +0000

IPwars is heading off into the sun, sand and the salty brine. Blogging will hopefully resume "on or about" Australia Day ... more likely "about".

In the meantime

Wishing you all the Compliments of the Season!

and a happy, healthy and safe 2010.

IPwars and irregular posting

war — Tue, 06 Oct 2009 10:50:07 +0000

Due to the exigencies of my day job, it is unlikely that IPwars will be in a position to post with anything like a degree of frequency until after Cup Day. Hope to see you at the other end of the tunnel!

Test – please ignore

war — Sun, 13 Sep 2009 01:05:17 +0000

g54b7fhrqz

Selected microblog posts w/e 30/8/09

war — Sun, 30 Aug 2009 01:45:10 +0000

Selected microblog posts from the past week:

Holman's review David Koepsell - Who Owns You? The Corporate Gold Rush to Patent Your Genes http://ff.im/-7dK4P
Patent Docs: Falsehoods, Distortions and Outright Lies in the Gene Patenting Debate http://ff.im/-7dK9H
Koepsell fights back http://ff.im/-7dKek
David Koepsell Doesn't Know How to Cut His Losseshttp://ff.im/-7dKbE
Patently-O: BRCA Gene Patents http://ff.im/-7mFuc

Wyeth gets interloc. injunction in Australia against Alphapharm for alleged infringement of Efexor-XR patent:http://bit.ly/dvYwy
Kenny J also rejects a higher threshold for interlocutory injunctions in patent cases http://bit.ly/SQViX ; Beecham doesn't rule.

RT @patentlyo: #Patent: Microsoft v. i4i: Briefing the Appeal http://digg.com/u1Bbhg

RT @asilverstein: RT @bnatechlaw: Blogged Turning the Page on "Hyperwrap" Contracts http://bit.ly/Fv5hf

How to Report Abuse to WordPress.com | PlagiarismToday http://ff.im/-733JQ
RT @MegLG: Music Publishers Group Finally Sues Lyrics Sites 08/26/2009 http://ow.ly/lnOo
the 1709 Copyright Blog: Knockback for record labels in US streaming decision http://ff.im/-73utR

Pros and Cons of Stand-Alone Non-Verbal Logos and Other Trademark Styles: A Legal Perspective : Duets Bloghttp://ff.im/-73bMH
RT @MegLG: Three Chocolate Companies Run Three Different Ways when it comes to TMs http://ow.ly/l2kyProperty, Intangible via @RonColeman

EU wants to investigate patent quality and trade mark system (via IPKat) http://ff.im/-73vD3
RT @mikk_IPR: Interactive Treaty Maphttp://www.pof.com.au/POFInteractiveMap. Berne Convention and WTO not included (yet?)
At last ... the 1709 Copyright Blog: Scottish court rules on jurisdiction regarding online infringementshttp://ff.im/-73c1h

Harvard Bus School on the impact of file sharing

war — Mon, 22 Jun 2009 09:54:50 +0000

Felix Oberholzer-Gee at Harvard and Koleman Strauss at Uni. of Kansas take an empirical look at the effect of file sharing on copyright industries. They accept that file sharing has weakened copyright protection (although they are quite sceptical about the studies trying to prove this). They argue this is only part of the question, however, for policy-makers. They contend that, if the role of copyright is to provide incentives to create new works, it is necessary to look rather more widely. For example, they note:

the publishing of new books increased by 66%
the number of new albums released more than doubled;
the number of feature films produced has increased by 30%,

in the early years of the 21st century. They also note that revenues from concert sales and merchandising and the like has also increased. Exploring this, their tentative conclusion for policymakers:

The role of complements makes it necessary to adopt a broad view of markets

when considering the impact of file sharing on the creative industries. Unfortunately, the

popular press – and a good number of policy experts – often evaluate file sharing looking

at a single product market. Analyzing trends in CD sales, for example, they conclude that

piracy has wrecked havoc on the music business. This view confuses value creation and

value capture. Record companies may find it more difficult to profitably sell CDs, but

the broader industry is in a far better position. In fact, it is easy to make an argument that

the business has grown considerably.

The role of complements makes it necessary to adopt a broad view of markets when considering the impact of file sharing on the creative industries. Unfortunately, the popular press – and a good number of policy experts – often evaluate file sharing looking at a single product market. Analyzing trends in CD sales, for example, they conclude that piracy has wrecked havoc on the music business. This view confuses value creation and value capture. Record companies may find it more difficult to profitably sell CDs, but the broader industry is in a far better position. In fact, it is easy to make an argument that the business has grown considerably.

Download the pdf here. Lid dip Joshua Gans

Secrecy laws

war — Fri, 19 Jun 2009 09:47:41 +0000

The ALRC has released a discussion paper outlining 65 proposals:

"to balance a growing commitment to increased openness and transparency in government with the legitimate need to maintain the secrecy and confidentiality of some Commonwealth information."

Submissions should be made by a leisurely 7 August 2009. According to the Media Briefing:

The chapters fall into four broad areas:

concepts and comparisons;

a general criminal secrecy offence;

specific secrecy offences; and

administrative duties, practices and procedures.

The chapters fall into four broad areas:

- concepts and comparisons;
- a general criminal secrecy offence;
- specific secrecy offences; and
- administrative duties, practices and procedures.

and the centre piece would be:

the ALRC proposes that the new general secrecy offence should only impose criminal liability where a particular disclosure did, was reasonably likely to, or was intended to:

harm the national security, defence or international relations of the Commonwealth;
prejudice the prevention, detection, investigation, prosecution or punishment of criminal offences, breaches of a law imposing a penalty or sanction, the enforcement of laws relating to the confiscation of the proceeds of crime, or the protection of the public revenue;
endanger the life or physical safety of any person;
pose a serious threat to public health or public safety;
have a substantial adverse effect on personal privacy; or
have a substantial adverse effect on a person in respect of his or her lawful business or professional affairs or on the business, commercial or financial affairs of an organisation.

There are also chapters on the administrative obligations of the Public Service and fostering effective information handling practices. (I guess that wouldn't be: we can't give you that for privacy reasons?). Discussion paper here. Media release Media briefing paper

Unfair competition in EU

war — Thu, 18 Jun 2009 12:19:36 +0000

According to the IPKat, the ECJ has introduced an EU-wide law of unfair competition/tarnishment for registered trade marks in L'Oreal v Bellure. Read more

Geographical indications

war — Sun, 31 May 2009 10:16:59 +0000

Bennett J has dismissed the Bavarian Beer (trade) association's opposition to the Dutch company, Bavaria NV's application to register the Bavarian Beer trade mark.

: (The application is in black and white)

Her Honour found:

182 In summary:

- The trade mark is inherently adapted to distinguish Bavaria NV’s goods from those of other traders and does so distinguish.
- If the trade mark were only inherently adapted to distinguish Bavaria NV’s goods to some extent, there would be insufficient evidence to find it capable of distinguishing Bavaria NV’s goods pursuant to s 41(5) of the Act.
- If the trade mark were not inherently adapted to distinguish Bavaria NV’s goods to any extent, there would be insufficient evidence to find it capable of distinguishing Bavaria NV’s goods pursuant to s 41(6) of the Act.
- I am not satisfied that the trade mark connotes that Bavaria NV’s product comes from Bavaria or that it has certain characteristics attributable to a Bavarian origin. I am not satisfied that the use of the trade mark would be likely to deceive or cause confusion or that it would be contrary to law.
- GENUINE BAVARIAN BEER and BAYERISCHES BEER are geographical indications for the purposes of ss 6 and 61 of the Act. Neither of these geographical indications equate with “Bavaria”. Section 61 does not refer to a sign that is substantially the same as or deceptively similar to a geographical indication. The trade mark does not contain a sign that is a geographical indication for the purposes of the Act.
- Even if the trade mark did contain a sign that is a geographical indication for the purposes of the Act, Bavaria NV would succeed in raising the defence under s 61(2)(c) of the Act.
- There is no discretion under s 55 of the Act to refuse to register a trade mark if none of the grounds of opposition are made out.

Professor Davison looks at the implications for (non-wine) GIs here. I'll just add that the Bavarians had argued s 55 of the Trade Marks Act conferred a discretion to block an application independently of the grounds of opposition. Hence the last bullet point above. Of course, the last time I went to Europe, the Netherlands did seem to be quite some distance from Bavaria. I'm not sure what the status of the war (between the 2 sides) in Germany is. Bennett J's decision in Bavaria NV v Bayerischer Brauerbund eV [2009] FCA 428

wolfing it down, er, up

war — Tue, 19 May 2009 09:21:03 +0000

Wolfram Alpha, a new search engine that attempts to answer questions, not "just" provide a list of potentially relevant websites. According to the website:

You enter your question or calculation, and Wolfram|Alpha uses its built-in algorithms and growing collection of data to compute the answer.

Perhaps rather more sexily, ask it what the answer to life, the universe and everything? The Daily Telegraph has a video. Lid dip, Joshua Gans (try his other examples).

Dancing on the ceiling

war — Thu, 30 Apr 2009 21:36:17 +0000

Forty years ago today, Minister Bowen's Act came into play. It's not often you wake up to the 40th birthday of the Copyright Act 1968 which came into force on 1 May 1969. From Note 1: see "Gazette 1969, p. 2543". With apologies to some Sergeants. More dancing on the ceiling here.

Blacklisted!

war — Thu, 30 Apr 2009 10:14:35 +0000

I'm having a little bit of a problem accessing IPwars from Chambers at the moment. It would appear in their wisdom the administrators of vicbar.com.au have blocked access to it! Pity about all the nightlife enhancement and/or Kenyan investment opportunities their spam filter sends to me. Oh well. I've been cybersquatted so I guess I shouldn't complain about yet another part of the full cyberspace experience. My apologies. It's also affecting my email accounts, so you should ensure you use my vicbar email available from Vicbar's website here (if you don't already have it).

World IP Court? 2

war — Fri, 03 Apr 2009 10:04:21 +0000

Howard suspects a ...

cat!

Denise Howell at Sound Policy discusses financial risk (what you and I might call insurance) for online activities here (also available through iTunes).

IP mapping?

war — Thu, 12 Mar 2009 09:19:15 +0000

So I'm watching a clever YouTube which Josh Gans points out has been annoyingly marred by a running stream of "subscript" advertisements. On of the ads is for IP Mapping which seems like a clever description of patent searching. No doubt, I'm being a bit perfunctory here. Anyone know what I'm missing?

Apologies

war — Sat, 07 Feb 2009 23:33:15 +0000

Sorry about the break in transmission - some glitch in a database somewhere meant that only files up to 13 August were showing up. Thanks to Jacques, everything seems to be back on an even keel now.

Seasons Greetings

war — Mon, 22 Dec 2008 13:33:08 +0000

The sand, the sea and (hopefully) the sun are calling. IPwars is swapping the quill and magnifying glasses for sun block and Stingose. Thankyou for visiting during 2008. I hope you found something of interest. Wishing you the Compliments of the Season! Normal transmission should resume late January.

Vale Sir Hugh Laddie