Comments for ipwars.com http://ipwars.com Mainly IP issues Down Under Tue, 06 Jan 2009 01:40:29 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2 Comment on Served by “Facebook” by war http://ipwars.com/2008/12/16/served-by-facebook/#comment-180 war Fri, 19 Dec 2008 22:31:50 +0000 http://ipwars.com/?p=444#comment-180 Peter Black tries to put the order for service via Facebook in perspective: http://www.news.com.au/couriermail/story/0,23739,24819211-27197,00.html Peter Black tries to put the order for service via Facebook in perspective:

http://www.news.com.au/couriermail/story/0,23739,24819211-27197,00.html

]]> Comment on The Internet Wars (copyright campaign) come to ISPs down under by ipwars.com » Blog Archive » YouTube and IP http://ipwars.com/2008/11/25/the-internet-wars-copyright-campaign-come-to-isps-down-under/#comment-179 ipwars.com » Blog Archive » YouTube and IP Fri, 19 Dec 2008 22:29:53 +0000 http://ipwars.com/?p=319#comment-179 [...] Howard Knopf worries that this might be because “sweet heart” deals are being reached with ISPs. Anyone want to sue, say, iiNet? [...] [...] Howard Knopf worries that this might be because “sweet heart” deals are being reached with ISPs. Anyone want to sue, say, iiNet? [...]

]]> Comment on Sex, videotapes and damages by ipwars.com » Blog Archive » Sex, videotapes and damages II http://ipwars.com/2008/12/11/sex-videotapes-and-damages/#comment-175 ipwars.com » Blog Archive » Sex, videotapes and damages II Tue, 16 Dec 2008 10:21:32 +0000 http://ipwars.com/?p=403#comment-175 [...] on from last week’s Giller v Procopets, I was asked if Max Mosley’s payment of the prostitutes precluded a claim for breach of [...] [...] on from last week’s Giller v Procopets, I was asked if Max Mosley’s payment of the prostitutes precluded a claim for breach of [...]

]]> Comment on Copyright owners versus ISPs by ipwars.com » Blog Archive » The Internet Wars (copyright campaign) come to ISPs down under http://ipwars.com/2008/07/29/brcopyright-owners-versus-ispsbr/#comment-154 ipwars.com » Blog Archive » The Internet Wars (copyright campaign) come to ISPs down under Thu, 27 Nov 2008 00:11:56 +0000 http://homepage.mac.com/wrothnie/iblog/C688984015/E20080729164804/index.html#comment-154 [...] the UK government has “brokered” some sort of more “pro-active” role on ISPs [...] [...] the UK government has “brokered” some sort of more “pro-active” role on ISPs [...]

]]> Comment on Jammie Thomas wins - sort of? by ipwars.com » Blog Archive » The record industry against the world http://ipwars.com/2008/09/26/jammie-thomas-wins-sort-of/#comment-104 ipwars.com » Blog Archive » The record industry against the world Mon, 20 Oct 2008 09:22:29 +0000 http://ipwars.com/?p=226#comment-104 [...] the RIAA is appealing (more here) the Jammie Thomas decision, seeking to be heard before the [...] [...] the RIAA is appealing (more here) the Jammie Thomas decision, seeking to be heard before the [...]

]]> Comment on Patentable subject matter by ipwars.com » Blog Archive » Manner of manufacture http://ipwars.com/2008/08/13/brpatentable-subject-matterbr/#comment-82 ipwars.com » Blog Archive » Manner of manufacture Fri, 10 Oct 2008 10:29:47 +0000 http://homepage.mac.com/wrothnie/iblog/C149316833/E20080813130841/index.html#comment-82 [...] to patent the new (?) science of subronics here and check out Prof. Lemley’s take on the issue or bone up on the ACIP review via [...] [...] to patent the new (?) science of subronics here and check out Prof. Lemley’s take on the issue or bone up on the ACIP review via [...]

]]> Comment on Australian Innovation Review by war http://ipwars.com/2008/09/10/australian-innovation-review/#comment-72 war Wed, 24 Sep 2008 07:20:52 +0000 http://ipwars.com/?p=180#comment-72 Thanks, John. Always good to get some positive feedback and hear other people's views. As it happens, I will be making a post a bit later on, probably tonight. Let us know when and where your post goes up. Thanks, John. Always good to get some positive feedback and hear other people’s views.

As it happens, I will be making a post a bit later on, probably tonight.

Let us know when and where your post goes up.

]]> Comment on Australian Innovation Review by John Haining http://ipwars.com/2008/09/10/australian-innovation-review/#comment-71 John Haining Wed, 24 Sep 2008 05:08:22 +0000 http://ipwars.com/?p=180#comment-71 Nice blog and very interesting subject area. Have you looked at the recommendations in Chapter 7 of the Review report (Venturous Australia) and, if so, what are your thoughts? I would like to write a blog post on same and am sourcing views and comments. Apparently some major law firm partners have been scathing about the recommendations. Nice blog and very interesting subject area. Have you looked at the recommendations in Chapter 7 of the Review report (Venturous Australia) and, if so, what are your thoughts?

I would like to write a blog post on same and am sourcing views and comments. Apparently some major law firm partners have been scathing about the recommendations.

]]> Comment on Patents List procedures by James http://ipwars.com/2008/09/12/patents-list-procedures/#comment-52 James Thu, 18 Sep 2008 12:17:49 +0000 http://ipwars.com/?p=183#comment-52 Hi, I found your blog on this new directory of WordPress Blogs at blackhatbootcamp.com/listofwordpressblogs. I dont know how your blog came up, must have been a typo, i duno. Anyways, I just clicked it and here I am. Your blog looks good. Have a nice day. James. Hi, I found your blog on this new directory of WordPress Blogs at blackhatbootcamp.com/listofwordpressblogs. I dont know how your blog came up, must have been a typo, i duno. Anyways, I just clicked it and here I am. Your blog looks good. Have a nice day. James.

]]> Comment on IceTV transcript is up by ipwars.com » Blog Archive » Stupefy! http://ipwars.com/2008/09/02/icetv-transcript-is-up/#comment-42 ipwars.com » Blog Archive » Stupefy! Tue, 09 Sep 2008 23:01:51 +0000 http://ipwars.com/?p=133#comment-42 [...] Wonder how it would play out here?  Of course, without looking at the book and seeing just how extensively the takings were, any comments would be worse than idle speculation.  We do have Full Court authority that taking lots of little snippets can constitute a substantial part but that, of course, is under appeal. [...] [...] Wonder how it would play out here?  Of course, without looking at the book and seeing just how extensively the takings were, any comments would be worse than idle speculation.  We do have Full Court authority that taking lots of little snippets can constitute a substantial part but that, of course, is under appeal. [...]

]]> Comment on Gripe sites and branding by war http://ipwars.com/2008/09/02/gripe-sites-and-branding/#comment-10 war Wed, 03 Sep 2008 08:04:23 +0000 http://ipwars.com/?p=131#comment-10 Prof. Manara has an interesting take at http://domaine.blogspot.com/2008/09/do-brandsuckscom-names-really-have.html Prof. Manara has an interesting take at http://domaine.blogspot.com/2008/09/do-brandsuckscom-names-really-have.html

]]>