The Senate Economics Committee requires submissions on the (intellectual property) Productivity Commission Response Pt 1 bill to be submitted by 1 June 2018
IP Australia’s preliminary conclusion is that joing the Hague Agreement for the registration of designs will cost Australian consumers a lot more than Australian designers will benefit
IP Australia has published 5 consultation papers on how to implement some of the Productivity Commission’s recommendations accepted by the Government
Over at the IpKat, Darren Meale has an extensive post explaining some of the intricate differences that arise when litigating an UK unregistered design right versus a registered design right. As he explains: But UKUDR is quite powerful. As noted above, a designer can essentially make up what it says its rights are once it has seen an alleged infringement appear on the market, and it can lawfully do so.. Read More
Justice Carr in the UK has weighed into case management of design infringement cases in a big way.
An exposure draft of legislation to rationalise, simplify and de-anomalies Australia’s IP laws. And some other things.
Here is a selection of links to IP-related matters I found interesting this week:
Here is a selection of links to IP-related matters I found interesting last week
Nicholas J has ruled that by selling its Razor fan Martec has infringed Hunter Pacific’s registered design for a ceiling fan hub, ADR No. 340171.
On 6 May 2016, the Government published its response to ACIP’s review of designs law. Who knew? ACIP came up with 23 recommendations. For the most part, the Government accepted ACIP’s recommendations.