<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ipwars.com &#187; misleading or deceptive conduct</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ipwars.com/tag/misleading-or-deceptive-conduct/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ipwars.com</link>
	<description>Mainly intellectual property (IP) issues Down Under</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 22:54:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
<cloud domain='ipwars.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />
		<item>
		<title>Coffee plungers, tea pots, designs and passing off</title>
		<link>http://ipwars.com/2010/02/08/coffee-plungers-tea-pots-designs-and-passing-off/</link>
		<comments>http://ipwars.com/2010/02/08/coffee-plungers-tea-pots-designs-and-passing-off/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 10:39:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>war</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Designs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trade marks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[baccarat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bodum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chambord]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coffee plunger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[euroline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[goodwill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[misleading or deceptive conduct]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[passing off]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[venice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ipwars.com/?p=1104</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Federal Court, Middleton J, has rejected Bodum's allegations thatthe sale of the Baccarat Venice coffee plunger and Euroline's Classic coffee plunger passed off Bodum's Chambord coffee plunger or was otherwise misleading or deceptive; orBaccarat's Devon teapot passed off Bodum's Assam Tea Press or was otherwise misleading or deceptive.Playcorp Group of Companies Pty Ltd v [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Federal Court, Middleton J, has rejected Bodum's allegations that</p><ol><li>the sale of the Baccarat Venice coffee plunger and Euroline's Classic coffee plunger passed off Bodum's Chambord coffee plunger or was otherwise misleading or deceptive; or</li><li>Baccarat's Devon teapot passed off Bodum's Assam Tea Press or was otherwise misleading or deceptive.</li></ol><p>Playcorp Group of Companies Pty Ltd v Peter Bodum A/S <a href="http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/FCA/2010/23.html" target="_blank">[2010] FCA 23</a></p><p>The judgment includes depictions of the products and their packaging in the appendices.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ipwars.com/2010/02/08/coffee-plungers-tea-pots-designs-and-passing-off/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Adwords and Keywords</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ipwars.com/tag/misleading-or-deceptive-conduct/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ipwars.com</link>
	<description>Mainly intellectual property (IP) issues Down Under</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 22:54:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
<cloud domain='ipwars.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />
		<item>
		<title>ipwars.com &#187; misleading or deceptive conduct</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ipwars.com/tag/misleading-or-deceptive-conduct/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ipwars.com</link>
	<description>Mainly intellectual property (IP) issues Down Under</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 22:54:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
<cloud domain='ipwars.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />
		<item>
		<title>Coffee plungers, tea pots, designs and passing off</title>
		<link>http://ipwars.com/2010/02/08/coffee-plungers-tea-pots-designs-and-passing-off/</link>
		<comments>http://ipwars.com/2010/02/08/coffee-plungers-tea-pots-designs-and-passing-off/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 10:39:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>war</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Designs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trade marks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[baccarat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bodum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chambord]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coffee plunger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[euroline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[goodwill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[misleading or deceptive conduct]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[passing off]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[venice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ipwars.com/?p=1104</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Federal Court, Middleton J, has rejected Bodum's allegations thatthe sale of the Baccarat Venice coffee plunger and Euroline's Classic coffee plunger passed off Bodum's Chambord coffee plunger or was otherwise misleading or deceptive; orBaccarat's Devon teapot passed off Bodum's Assam Tea Press or was otherwise misleading or deceptive.Playcorp Group of Companies Pty Ltd v [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Federal Court, Middleton J, has rejected Bodum's allegations that</p><ol><li>the sale of the Baccarat Venice coffee plunger and Euroline's Classic coffee plunger passed off Bodum's Chambord coffee plunger or was otherwise misleading or deceptive; or</li><li>Baccarat's Devon teapot passed off Bodum's Assam Tea Press or was otherwise misleading or deceptive.</li></ol><p>Playcorp Group of Companies Pty Ltd v Peter Bodum A/S <a href="http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/FCA/2010/23.html" target="_blank">[2010] FCA 23</a></p><p>The judgment includes depictions of the products and their packaging in the appendices.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ipwars.com/2010/02/08/coffee-plungers-tea-pots-designs-and-passing-off/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Adwords and Keywords</title>
		<link>http://ipwars.com/2010/02/08/coffee-plungers-tea-pots-designs-and-passing-off/</link>
		<comments>http://ipwars.com/2010/02/08/coffee-plungers-tea-pots-designs-and-passing-off/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 10:39:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>war</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Designs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trade marks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[baccarat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bodum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chambord]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coffee plunger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[euroline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[goodwill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[misleading or deceptive conduct]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[passing off]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[venice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ipwars.com/?p=1104</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Federal Court, Middleton J, has rejected Bodum's allegations thatthe sale of the Baccarat Venice coffee plunger and Euroline's Classic coffee plunger passed off Bodum's Chambord coffee plunger or was otherwise misleading or deceptive; orBaccarat's Devon teapot passed off Bodum's Assam Tea Press or was otherwise misleading or deceptive.Playcorp Group of Companies Pty Ltd v [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Federal Court, Middleton J, has rejected Bodum's allegations that</p><ol><li>the sale of the Baccarat Venice coffee plunger and Euroline's Classic coffee plunger passed off Bodum's Chambord coffee plunger or was otherwise misleading or deceptive; or</li><li>Baccarat's Devon teapot passed off Bodum's Assam Tea Press or was otherwise misleading or deceptive.</li></ol><p>Playcorp Group of Companies Pty Ltd v Peter Bodum A/S <a href="http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/FCA/2010/23.html" target="_blank">[2010] FCA 23</a></p><p>The judgment includes depictions of the products and their packaging in the appendices.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ipwars.com/2010/02/08/coffee-plungers-tea-pots-designs-and-passing-off/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ipwars.com &#187; misleading or deceptive conduct</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ipwars.com/tag/misleading-or-deceptive-conduct/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ipwars.com</link>
	<description>Mainly intellectual property (IP) issues Down Under</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 22:54:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
<cloud domain='ipwars.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />
		<item>
		<title>Coffee plungers, tea pots, designs and passing off</title>
		<link>http://ipwars.com/2010/02/08/coffee-plungers-tea-pots-designs-and-passing-off/</link>
		<comments>http://ipwars.com/2010/02/08/coffee-plungers-tea-pots-designs-and-passing-off/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 10:39:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>war</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Designs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trade marks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[baccarat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bodum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chambord]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coffee plunger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[euroline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[goodwill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[misleading or deceptive conduct]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[passing off]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[venice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ipwars.com/?p=1104</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Federal Court, Middleton J, has rejected Bodum's allegations thatthe sale of the Baccarat Venice coffee plunger and Euroline's Classic coffee plunger passed off Bodum's Chambord coffee plunger or was otherwise misleading or deceptive; orBaccarat's Devon teapot passed off Bodum's Assam Tea Press or was otherwise misleading or deceptive.Playcorp Group of Companies Pty Ltd v [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Federal Court, Middleton J, has rejected Bodum's allegations that</p><ol><li>the sale of the Baccarat Venice coffee plunger and Euroline's Classic coffee plunger passed off Bodum's Chambord coffee plunger or was otherwise misleading or deceptive; or</li><li>Baccarat's Devon teapot passed off Bodum's Assam Tea Press or was otherwise misleading or deceptive.</li></ol><p>Playcorp Group of Companies Pty Ltd v Peter Bodum A/S <a href="http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/FCA/2010/23.html" target="_blank">[2010] FCA 23</a></p><p>The judgment includes depictions of the products and their packaging in the appendices.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ipwars.com/2010/02/08/coffee-plungers-tea-pots-designs-and-passing-off/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Adwords and Keywords</title>
		<link>http://ipwars.com/2009/03/25/adwords-and-keywords/</link>
		<comments>http://ipwars.com/2009/03/25/adwords-and-keywords/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 10:09:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>war</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Trade marks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Add new tag]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[keywords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[misleading or deceptive conduct]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ipwars.com/?p=628</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Prof. Gans over at CoreEcon takes issue with Eric Clemons' paper in which Prof. Clemons appears to be arguing that Google's business model - using sponsored links and paid advertising triggered by keywords and the like - is based on misdirection. Now, if Prof. Clemons were right, that could be a reason for contending that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Prof. Gans over at CoreEcon <a href="http://economics.com.au/?p=3011" target="_blank">takes issue</a> with Eric Clemons' paper in which Prof. Clemons appears to be arguing that Google's business model - using sponsored links and paid advertising triggered by keywords and the like - is based on misdirection.

Now, if Prof. Clemons were right, that could be a reason for contending that the use of trade marks in keywords etc. is (at least) misleading or deceptive conduct. But, as noted, Prof. Gans puts a very big question mark over this.

Now, neither of the Professors is dealing with the legal arguments, but I do wonder why people would click on (keep clicking on) Google's sponsored links on the scale which they apparently do if the sponsored links etc. were in fact misdirecting them.

Whatever happened to the case which the ACCC brought against Google here? 
<ul>
	<li>ACCC <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/792088/fromItemId/142" target="_blank">press release</a></li>
	<li>Trading Post <a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/691386/fromItemId/622047" target="_blank">settled</a></li>
</ul>
IPKat overlooks the work in progress in the EU <a href="http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/2009/03/adwords-and-keywords-everywhere.html" target="_blank">here</a>.
<ul></ul>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ipwars.com/2009/03/25/adwords-and-keywords/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
