Moshinsky J has rejected Intervet’s claim to entitlement to a patent application on the basis of the US “hired to invent” doctrine
An exposure draft of legislation to rationalise, simplify and de-anomalies Australia’s IP laws. And some other things.
Here is a selection of links to IP-related matters I found interesting this week:
Logan J has ruled that documents prepared by a firm of trade mark attorneys in connection with a domain name arbitration are not covered by trade marks attorney privilege
The Full Court has accepted that an exclusive licensee can agree to acquire all its requirements of the licensed products from the patentee. A sub-licensee, however, is not an exclusive licensee.
According to the traditional view, recently applied by Rares J, there would be no infringement in Australia in the circumstances outlined.
Selected links from last week
A selection of the links I found interesting over the last couple of weeks
Here is a selection of links to IP-related matters I found interesting last week
In case you missed the: A selection of links I found interesting last week