IPwars.com

Mainly intellectual property (IP) issues Down Under

Shape not misleading

In adopting its new name, Shape Australia did not misrepresent that it was associated in some way with Shape Shopfitters or pass off the latter.

Shape shopped

Mortimer J has dismissed Shape Shopfitters claims against Shape Australia for misleading or deceptive conduct, passing off and trade mark infringement – a look at the trade mark infringement case.

Should Michelin’s X block Continental’s Xking?

Should Michelin’s “X” trade mark block registration and use of Continental’s “Xking” trade mark for tyres?

Pham Global 2: the new law of substantial identity

The Full Court also indicated a substantially expanded role for the test of substantial identity in stating that Pham Global’s trade mark was substantially identical with Insight Clinical’s.

Don’t file in the wrong applicant’s name

Filing a trade mark application by the wrong person invalidates the resulting registration

Print outs of third party websites ruled inadmissible

Mortimer J has ruled that print outs of third party websites are inadmissible as hearsay and, if not, excluded under s 135 of the Evidence Act as unduly prejudicial.

Accor gets its trade marks back

The Full Court has allowed Accor’s appeal for a decision expunging one of its trade marks and removing some of the services from others

Intellectual Property Laws Amendment Bill 2017 – exposure draft

An exposure draft of legislation to rationalise, simplify and de-anomalies Australia’s IP laws. And some other things.

Selected links from the last week (or so)

Here is a selection of links to IP-related matters I found interesting this week:

Are you carrying on business in Australia by registering a trade mark here

If you need authority for the proposition that registering a trade mark, or enforcing the rights under the registration, does not necessarily mean you are carrying on business in Australia, Besanko J may help you out.

%d bloggers like this: