The way the press is reporting it, the Minister for Communications – one of the two Ministers who released the Online Copyright Infringement discussion paper in July – recognises it’s back to the drawing board in light of the (apparently) unanimous disapproval.
You can find the submissions received here (apparently they are being uploaded over time).
Will the ISPs voluntarily sit down and negotiate a warning system with the copyright owners? Do we really want the copyright owners and the ISPs coming up with their own scheme without “our” input?
I should note for the record, that the Government did officially release its Online Copyright Infringement discussion paper (pdf) on 30 July 2014.
Responses are required by 1 September 2014.
There are 3 main proposals:
- extend the definition of ‘authorisation’ by amending ss 36(1A) and 101(1A)
- introduce power for rights owners to obtain orders against ISPs to block access to infringing websites (like s 97A in the UK)
- give some real scope to the “safe harbours” by extending their availability from “carriage service providers” to “service providers”.
The discussion paper does say in relation to ‘extended authorisation’:
The Copyright Act would be amended to clarify the application of authorisation liability under sections 36 and 101 to ISPs.
It’s not clear how this will be done. While the discussion paper does specifically identify amendments to ss 36(1A) and 101(1A), the proposed changes apply generally to everyone and not specifically to ISPs. It is also not immediately clear how the proposed changes in fact cause ISPs to become liable for authorisation.
It does seem to be a policy still in development.
The Minister for Communications linked the reforms to some positive action about the very high prices Australians are charged for online access to copyright materials such as recorded music, movies, software etc. compared to the prices charged overseas.
He and the Attorney-General may also have different ideas about who should bear the costs of the scheme.